This first post will reference a character who will most certainly be a frequent flier, Rush Limbaugh. Now Mr. Limbaugh is unique in that he pushes his opinion with such malice, deceit, and fervor that he exists in a category all of his own. This is a man who has absolutely no issue with mimicking and mocking a man with Parkinson's in order to further his agenda. So it is with pleasure and diligence that I pay particularly close attention to Mr. Limbaugh. And away we go...
So let's dissect this argument together. Rush starts by tossing out what he says are the latest numbers from the CDC on flu related deaths in the United States.
I have a press release from the Centers for Disease Control. Now, the press release is January 7, 2003. Now, admittedly, this is six years ago. But it's most recent I could find. "Using new and improved statistical models, [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] scientists estimate that an average of 36,000 people ... each year in the United States. In addition, about 11,000 people die per year from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), a virus that causes upper and lower respiratory tract infections primarily in young children [crumb crunchers] and older adults." So in a normal year... The reason I looked this up is because I was asking about this yesterday. In a normal year, 36,000 people die in this country of the flu. Now, this pig flu apparently doesn't just hit the elderly.
Right off of the bat I have to point out that a jaunt over to the CDC website and a simple search for "flu deaths" generates a result that discusses statistics from 2007 and 2008. So Rush's statement about "all he could find" is a bit shaky from jumpstreet, but I will grant him leeway that specific numbers regarding non-child deaths are not as readily available in the 2007-2008 article. The most significant point that surfaces from doing a minuscule amount of reading on this topic, however, is that the Center for Disease Control states that actual numbers of flu-related deaths are extremely difficult to determine as only deaths of children cause by influenza are required to be reported. Take a look.
Exact numbers of how many people died from flu this season cannot be determined. Flu-associated deaths (which have laboratory confirmed influenza), are only a nationally notifiable condition among children; however not all pediatric influenza deaths may be detected and reported and there is no requirement to report adult deaths from influenza. source: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/qa/season.htmLet's move from Limbaugh's shaky numbers and extremely poor Googling skills, and examine the thesis of his argument. Rush makes the jump to say that the reason that no one is dying here in the United States and so many are dying in Mexico, is that Mexico has socialized medicine while we do not. THAT'S IT! Rush obviously has thoroughly researched this and has formulated a rock solid hypothesis bordering on undeniable fact here. You see the Rush logic works like this: Mexico employs a system of health care which Rush is politically, ideologically, and financially opposed to, so obviously this must be the cause of the Swine Flu deaths in Mexico. Rush does a shoddy job of garnering statistics and numbers that may vaguely support his push-point, and then rams them down the throats of his listeners as if they were the "Gospel" truth. In all honesty, one could take a driving tour of the South and stop in any little town and inevitably ask citizens why people are dying in Mexico from the Swine Flu and not in the United States, and the response in an overwhelming amount of cases would be, "Because they have socialized medicine."
It is truly unbelievable to me how easily the average citizen (especially the Southerners) swallow Limbaugh's swill hook, line and sinker, but that's why I started the Informed Southerner to hopefully show at least one individual out there that he or she should kick the tires before they buy the car, so to speak. So let's kick the tires...
- Rush is basing this conclusion on the 150 deaths estimate that is being touted by many. Well the WHO issued a press release today that states that number is grossly overestimated. Indeed they only are able to attribute SEVEN deaths to the Swine Flu, and those are in fact in Mexico. Granted many more may eventually be chalked up to the swine flu once thorough analysis post mortem has been concluded, but these numbers are absolutely nothing to bank on as of yet. sourece: http://www.news.com.au/perthnow/story/0,21498,25403429-5005361,00.html?from=public_rss
- Rush attributes the deaths to the fact that Mexico's socialized system isn't treating it's citizenry, thus they are dying. The fact is that this virus has most likely been present in Mexico for a great deal longer than the United States, and it has had time to affect and unfortunately kill more individuals seems to have not even blipped Mr. Limbaugh's radar. In traditional Rush fashion he completely ignores anything that might be based in scientific fact or research. For instance take a look at a post from the Daily Kos, and read his opinion on the situation and the logical progression of the case fatality rate (CFR) of this virus.
Human flu genes got into the virus in two ways. One, humans with normal seasonal flu fed their dinner table food wastes to their household pigs. Two, humans with seasonal flu interacted with their household pigs in the yard. Thus the human flu genes mixed with the avian & swine flu genes present in the pigs.
The new combined virus was transmissible from pigs back to humans, and was also H2H (human-to-human) transmissible. Thus it passed among humans. As often happens with new viruses, the virus was most virulent (caused the worst symptoms and highest death rate) among those who were in closest proximity to the source of initial infection. This would account for the high CFR (case fatality rate) among the cases in Mexico.
So now you have the "ground zero" infections: people who caught it from pigs, or from people who had high contact with pigs. These people got the worst of it and had the highest death rate.
After that came the "first ring" infections: people who caught it from the "ground zero" cases. CFR would be starting to decrease in this population.
After that, the "second ring" infections: people who caught it from the first ring cases. CFR would decrease further in this population.
After that, the "third ring" infections: people who caught it from the second ring cases. This would most likely be the people in the US who caught it. Notice that so far, the CFR in the US is zero: no deaths. This would be consistent with the virus losing some of its virulence as it passed between humans: a common occurrence for new viruses. Source: http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/4/25/205934/014
This is just a small sample of exactly how unresearched and completely jaded/biased Rush Limbaugh's opinions can truly be. One thing complimentary I must say about Mr. Limbaugh is he is always consistent.
**Update: The confirmed death toll in Mexico has now risen to 19, still a far cry from the original one hundred and fifty some-odd deaths reported by the over-hyped media. So what has Rush done as this situation has evolved and much of the information released and publicized has been shown to be false? Does he recant? Does he update his previous shows or correct his info on a current show? Naaahhh. He blames the swine flu and the Mexico City Earthquake on Obama! This guy is a gem! Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dz5_QxmMRog
No comments:
Post a Comment